Demonstrate limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment

Looking for some help? We have it all. Great price and impressive quality

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order

Learning Goal: I’m working on a nursing discussion question and need support to help me learn.
After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, review and discuss the MindTap case study – Case Studies in Psychotherapy Workbook – The Case of Roger.
In your own words, summarize the case in your video:What was the case about
Who did it involve
What happened in the case
What caused the distress
Create a video that demonstrates you performing Psychodynamic Music Therapy as a psychotherapeutic technique during the patient session as a tool to relieve the patient in this case.
Grading RubricYour assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Discussion Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPoints
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and ConceptsDistinguished – 4 points
Post substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.Excellent – 3 points
Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.Fair – 1-2 points
Demonstrate limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.Poor – 0 points
Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear. Or nothing was posted.4 points
APA Formatting GuidelinesDistinguished – 2 points
The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent and in-text citations.Excellent – 1.5 points
References page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Fair – 1 point
References page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Poor – 0 points
References page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. Or nothing was posted.2 points
Writing MechanicsDistinguished – 2 points
Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.Excellent – 1.5 points
Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.Fair – 1 point
Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.Poor – 0 points
Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.2 points
Peer ResponsesDistinguished – 2 points
Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.Fair – 1 point
Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.Poor – 0 points
Provided no response to a peer’s post. 2 points
Total Points 10

Looking for some help? We have it all. Great price and impressive quality

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *