Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence)

Looking for some help? We have it all. Great price and impressive quality

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order

Learning Goal: I’m working on a health & medical writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Assessment Description
Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to “Communicable Disease Chain,” “Chain of Infection,” and the CDC website for assistance when completing this assignment.
Communicable Disease Selection
Chickenpox
Tuberculosis
Influenza
Mononucleosis
Hepatitis B
HIV
Ebola
Measles
Polio
Influenza
Epidemiology Paper Requirements
Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to report to, etc.
Describe the social determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.
Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Are there any special considerations or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?
Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collection, data analysis, and follow-up) and why demographic data are necessary to the health of the community.
Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organizations contribute to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.
Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area? Provide an example.
A minimum of three peer-reviewed or professional references is required.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.
Rubric CriteriaCollapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All
Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest12.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionComprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest
5. Excellent12.5 pointsOverview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors.
4. Good11.5 pointsClinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate.
3. Satisfactory11 pointsOverview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors.
2. Less Than Satisfactory10 pointsLimited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDemographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development12.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDeterminants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development
5. Excellent12.5 pointsPaper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points.
4. Good11.5 pointsPaper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression.
3. Satisfactory11 pointsPaper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease.
2. Less Than Satisfactory10 pointsPaper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDescription of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors25 pointsCriteria DescriptionEpidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors
5. Excellent25 pointsThe communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included.
4. Good23 pointsThe communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented.
3. Satisfactory22 pointsThe communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle.
2. Less Than Satisfactory20 pointsThe communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDescription of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data25 pointsCriteria DescriptionRole of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data
5. Excellent25 pointsDiscussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented.
4. Good23 pointsDiscussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented.
3. Satisfactory22 pointsDiscussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized.
2. Less Than Satisfactory20 pointsDiscussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDiscussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear.
National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease12.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionNational Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease
5. Excellent12.5 pointsAn agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered.
4. Good11.5 pointsAn agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief.
3. Satisfactory11 pointsAn agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking.
2. Less Than Satisfactory10 pointsAn agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsAgency and description of contribution are omitted.
Global Implication12.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionGlobal Implication
5. Excellent12.5 pointsA discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
4. Good11.5 pointsA discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
3. Satisfactory11 pointsA discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
2. Less Than Satisfactory10 pointsA discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsGlobal implication of the disease is omitted or unclear.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 6.25 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Excellent6.25 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
4. Good5.75 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Satisfactory5.5 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Less Than Satisfactory5 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion 6.25 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
5. Excellent6.25 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Good5.75 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Satisfactory5.5 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory5 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
Evidence6.25 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
5. Excellent6.25 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
4. Good5.75 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Satisfactory5.5 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory5 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
Mechanics of Writing 2.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Excellent2.5 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Good2.3 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Satisfactory2.2 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Less Than Satisfactory2 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation3.75 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Excellent3.75 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Good3.45 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Satisfactory3.3 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Less Than Satisfactory3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total125 points

Looking for some help? We have it all. Great price and impressive quality

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *